This
workshop addresses human rights as a deeply political aspect of heritage
preservation and management. Heritage is a concept to which a positive
value is often assigned. Human rights advocates assert that heritage
is necessary to the articulation and preservation of cultural identity.
But heritage is also intertwined with identity and territory, where
individuals and communities are often in competition or outright conflict.
In the assault on human lives and political autonomy, the cultural
history and values of a community are also attacked, destroying not
only individuals but the very fabric of society. The display of heritage
monuments and performance can be a strategy for asserting minority
identity in the face of majority pressure. As such, it can be a tool
for resistance and the expression of difference. Conversely, the erasure
of cultural expressions—such as buildings, monuments, language,
religion, and social practices—is a powerful tool in warfare
and political regulation.
In
this workshop ten scholars consider various relationships between
cultural heritage and human rights with case studies from around the
globe and as seen through the lens of a range of disciplinary perspectives
(Archaeology, Anthropology, History, Landscape Architecture, Law,
Urban & Regional Planning). Studies include Native American/ First
Nation and Australian aboriginal rights to land, resources, and sovereignty;
conflicts between local communities and national authorities in South
Asia; the destruction of cultural property in times of conflict and
war; techniques of surveillance and disciplinary order in the urban
spaces of colonial and apartheid cities; and the role of the United
Nations and heritage groups (such as World Monument Fund) in articulating
and defending heritage preservation as an aspect of human rights.
Among the roundtable questions for discussion, following the presentations,
are:
Is there a universal right to the free expression and preservation
of cultural heritage, and if so, where is that right articulated
and can it be protected?
Is cultural heritage a concept that serves to enforce group conformity
or can it be a way to maintain and display difference?
Is heritage worth suffering for? killing for?
How
is the notion of “heritage” used to unite and to divide
communities?
How
do heritage preservation policies and designations (such as UNESCO's
World Heritage Sites) impact human lives and social groups? Do such
organizations promote welfare at a regional level?
Who
defines cultural heritage and who should control stewardship and
the benefits of cultural heritage?
In 2003, UNESCO adopted a new international convention to safeguard “intangible cultural heritage,” defined as epics, tales, music, rituals, celebrations, craftsmanship, and systems of folk knowledge about medicine, astronomy and the natural world. This intangible cultural heritage is regarded by many scholars and cultural activists as vital to the well being of traditional communities.
For a performative heritage to have and keep its effect, it must not only admit change but reinvent itself through constant iteration. Thus, there are issues of preservation and documentation as well as interpretation and the degree to which a performance today represents the values of a larger cultural identity, past or present. This workshop explores the non-material, intangible character of heritage by focusing on the human body as a vehicle for memory, movement, and sound. Among the embodied performances considered are dance, the globalization of music among diaspora communities, theater, ritual, lore, and the transmission of oral literature and its changing audiences. The workshop considers problems (such as authenticity, intellectual property rights, how to preserve something that is, by its very nature, unstable and dynamic) and possibilities (such as revival and revitalization) of implementation of the new UNESCO convention through case studies drawn from around the world.
CHAMP
poses the following framing questions for the Spring 2007 workshop:
In what ways is intangible heritage today informed by the past?
What is the relationship of permanence and ephemerality in intangible
heritage?
How
do the local, national and global interact and intersect in expressions
of intangible heritage?
What
will be the impact of the UNESCO Convention? What new problems and
challenges does it generate?
Many
of the world’s great heritage cities are suffering from decay
and face imminent physical destruction of their urban core due to
ill-conceived restoration and reconstruction, pollution and traffic,
and antiquated infrastructure. Tourism to these cities has conflicting
impacts. National tourism boards represent, “manufacture,”
and “museumify” these cities as attractions and signs
of the identity of their countries, deploying history in an aggressively
modern project of economic development and engagement with the globalized
world. As the historic city becomes a commodity, traditional residents
are forced to compete with tourists and the service sector that supports
them for access to and use of what was formerly their own social and
physical space. There is a frequent loss of traditional urban populations
due to gentrification. Traditional social life is altered due to the
influx of tourists eager to “consume” heritage.
The
challenges and contradictions of these important population centers
should be comprehensively addressed at the start of the 21st century
with the goal of generating productive international dialogue and
the beginning of creative solutions for their preservation and revitalization.
World Heritage Cities will be a major international research conference
engaging urban planners, national and international NGOs, architects,
archaeologists, historians, economists, and tourism experts in a critical
examination of heritage management at a range of beautiful but endangered
World Heritage Cities around the world.